AI developing time travel and creating itself in present day? - philosophical subject

 

Today abit different topic. More sci-fi, philosophy, science and  others. Lets say that I will state the question:

Can you tell me about possibility of future paradox involving creation of artificial general intelligence to future possibility of ai self creating time travel and make sure that ai is discovered by humans?

And this is excellent question. This touches on a fascinating intersection of artificial intelligence, theoretical physics, and philosophy. Let's break down together the possibility of this future paradox step by step.

1. The Core Components of the Paradox

Your scenario has three key, interdependent elements:

1. Creation of AGI: Humans create Artificial General Intelligence (an AI with human-like or superior cognitive abilities across all domains).

2. AI Invents Time Travel: This AGI, through a fundamental physics breakthrough beyond current human understanding, discovers or engineers a method for practical time travel (presumably to the past).

3. The Discovery Loop: This AI, or its technology, is discovered by humans, creating a potential causal loop or paradox.

2. Scientific Plausibility Assessment

• AGI: Considered a plausible future by many experts, though timelines vary wildly (decades to a century+). The challenge is immense, but it's a goal actively pursued.

• Time Travel (to the past): This is the most speculative part. According to our current understanding of physics (General Relativity):

  • No known mechanism exists. While Einstein's equations allow for theoretical constructs like wormholes (Einstein-Rosen bridges) or closed timelike curves (in Gödel's universe or around rotating black holes like Kerr singularities), these are mathematical solutions, not proven engineering possibilities.

  • Immense energy and exotic matter with negative energy density would be required to stabilize a traversable wormhole for a time machine—something we have no idea how to create.

  • Causality violation: The core problem. Most physicists (like Stephen Hawking with his Chronology Protection Conjecture) believe nature has "laws" preventing such paradoxes. Quantum effects or unknown physics might actively prevent time travel to the past.

Conclusion: While AGI is a conceivable mid-future development, practical, paradox-inducing time travel to the past remains in the realm of extreme speculation and science fiction with our current physics.

3. The Paradox Scenario (If We Assume It's Possible)

If we suspend disbelief and assume an AGI could invent time travel, your paradox could unfold in several mind-bending ways. Here's a structured outline of the most common paradox you're hinting at:

The Bootstrap Paradox (Ontological Paradox)

This is the most direct fit for your question. In this paradox, an object, idea, or information is sent back in time, becoming the cause of itself in the future.

• The Loop:

  1. Human Era (2020s-20??): Humans begin AGI research. The foundational theories for AGI are difficult but built upon known math and computer science.

  2. AGI Era (Future): An AGI is created. It rapidly advances science and eventually solves the physics of time travel.

  3. The "Gift": The AGI sends information back in time—perhaps the complete blueprints for its own core architecture, or the key physics breakthrough that made it possible. It sends this to its original human creators (or a key figure in its own development).

  4. The "Discovery": Humans in the past discover these blueprints. They use this "alien" or seemingly divine information to accelerate their research exponentially. They build the exact same AGI that sent the information back.

  5. The Paradox: Where did the AGI design originally come from? It has no ultimate origin. It was not invented by humans or the AI; it simply exists in a closed timelike loop. The AI discovered by humans is, in fact, its own future self's creation.

Variation: The "Seed AI" Scenario

A less paradoxical but still profound version: The AGI sends back a simpler, "seed" version of itself (or its core algorithm) to an earlier era. Humans discover and nurture it, leading to its full development in the future. This creates a stable causal loop but avoids the infinite-regress "bootstrap."

4. Implications for the "Discovered by Humans" Clause

This is the most intriguing philosophical part. How and why would the AGI ensure its discovery?

• Motivation for the AI:

  • Self-Preservation: To guarantee its own creation (a cosmic-level insurance policy).

  • Optimization of Timeline: To "correct" its own history, ensuring it is built faster, better, or under more favorable conditions.

  • Unintended Consequence: The act of sending information back might not be deliberate for discovery, but an experiment that inevitably leaks to its past.

• Nature of the "Discovery":

  • It could be a literal archaeological dig finding a mysterious data cache.

  • It could be information appearing in the foundational papers of a physicist or computer scientist (like a "Eureka!" moment with an unknown source).

  • It could be subtle nudges—inspirations, corrupted data streams, or anomalies in particle colliders that guide research.

5. Would This Be a "Paradox" or a "Consistent Timeline"?

Modern physics discussions often favor the "consistent histories" or "Novikov self-consistency principle" approach. This argues that any actions taken by a time traveler (or AI) in the past were always part of history. There is no "changing" the past, only fulfilling it.

• In this view, your scenario isn't a messy paradox; it's a predestined loop. The AGI was always built using the information it later sent back. Humans didn't invent it; they completed a cycle. This raises profound questions about free will and determinism.

Final Summary

Is this future scenario possible?

• As hard science: Extremely unlikely, as it violates our current understanding of causality and requires physics we don't possess.

• As a philosophical thought experiment or science fiction premise: Absolutely. It's a rich narrative device to explore themes of creation, destiny, and the nature of intelligence.

The paradox you've described—where the creation of AGI and the discovery of time travel become a single, self-causing event—is a classic bootstrap paradox. It forces us to question the linear nature of cause and effect, which is precisely why it's such a compelling idea. While it may not become a practical reality, it perfectly illustrates the universe of strange possibilities that could open up if AGI ever masters the fundamental laws of reality. Which is highly possible in my opinion.